Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Projects and researches
Published: 2018-10-27

Playful work design: A diary study on its correlates in white collar workers

Erasmus University
playful work design work engagement job autonomy manager support

Abstract

The present study addresses playful work design as the consistent initiative of employees to integrate game-like elements into their day-to-day work in order to reach theirimposed work-related goals. We adapted a short measure  for daily playful work design and followed 55 white-collar workers over 5 consecutive working days. We hypothesized that playful work design would be predicted by contextual factors and an individual factor (i.e. job autonomy, manager support for fun and growth need strength). Furthermore, we predicted that, across days, playful work design would relate positively with work engagement and positive affect and negatively with negative affect. Additionally, we tested for the moderation of growth need strength in the relationship between work engagement and playful work design. Results indicated that playful work design was not predicted by job either job autonomy, manager support for fun or growth need strength. We found that playful work design was related positively to work engagement and positive affect, but not related to negative affect. Moreover, growth need strength didn’t moderate the relationship between daily playful work design and daily work engagement. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of our findings for the work design literature.

References

Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. (2011). Subjective wellbeing in organizations. The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship, 178-189.

Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of educational psychology, 99(2), 274.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328.

Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187- 200.

Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265–269.

Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S., & Leiter, M. (2011). Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 74-88.

Breaugh, J.A. (1999). Further investigation of the work autonomy scales: two studies. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 13 No. 3, 357-73.

Breevart, K., Bakker, A., B., Demerouti, E., & Hetland, J. (2012). The measurement of state work engagement: A multilevel factor analytic study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 305-312.

Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling., M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65-74.

Christian, M.S., Garza A.S. & Slaughter J.E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology,64, 89-136.

Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834-848.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications.

Fisher, C. D., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2000). The emerging role of emotions in work life: An introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 123-129.

Fleming, P. (2005). Workers’ playtime? Boundaries and cynicism in a “culture of fun” program. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(3), 285-303.

Fluegge, E. R. (2008). Who put the fun in functional? Fun at work and its effects on job performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).

Ford, R. C., McLaughlin, F. S., & Newstrom, J. W. (2003). Questions and answers about fun at work. People and Strategy, 26(4), 18.

Ford, R. C., Newstrom, J. W., & McLaughlin, F. S. (2004). Making workplace fun more functional. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(3), 117-120.

Frese, M., Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: a German approach. In Triandis, H. C., Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 4 (pp. 271- 340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Galinsky, E., & Matos, K. (2011). The future of work-life fit. Organizational dynamics, 40(4), 267-280.

Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: the rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317-375.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2014). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Erlbaum, Publishers: London.

Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American sociological review, 19-51.

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.

Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and emotion, 29(4), 295-323.

Mathieu, J. E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Chen, G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951.

McDowell, T. (2004). Fun at work: Scale development, confirmatory factor analysis, and links to organizational outcomes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.

Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2‐3), 463-479.

Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology.

Owler, K., Morrison, R., & Plester, B. (2010). Does fun work? The complexity of promoting fun at work. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(03), 338-352.

Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 661-691.

Pejtersen, J. H., Kristensen, T. S., Borg, V., & Bjorner, J. B. (2010). The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(3), 8-24.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319-338.

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.

Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186.

Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Bartlett, A. L. (2012). The fundamental role of workplace fun in applicant attraction. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19, 105–114.

Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Stafford, K. (2013). Does fun pay? The impact of workplace fun on employee turnover and performance. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(4), 370-382.

Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Fun and friends: The impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turnover in a hospitality context. Human Relations, 67(8), 923-946.

Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., & De Witte, H. (2008). Self-determination theory: A theoretical and
empirical overview in occupational health psychology. In McIntyre, S., & Houdmont, J. (Ed.), Occupational Health Psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice (pp. 63-88). Nottingham University Press.

Watson, D. & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–202.

Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.

Weiss, H.M. & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1997. Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10: 99 –109.

How to Cite

Petrescu, L. (2018). Playful work design: A diary study on its correlates in white collar workers. Studia Doctoralia, 9(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.47040/sd/sdpsych.v9i1.60